My brother has a new cat, and it has taken up residence on my floor of the house. Unfortunately for me, the only place where this cat is safe from Jamie’s first cat (Butters) is under my bed. Butters is too fat to fit under there. I don’t agree with the fear this cat has of Butters, but I do agree that if he needed to flee from Butters, underneath my bed is his best option.
Unfortunately for me, however, this means that my bedroom door must be open at all times. This has provided me with weeks of restless sleep. It’s not the easiest thing to sleep while two cats are moaning at each other and smacking noisy balls against the walls of my bedroom. It’s only when the cat brings one of those noisy things onto my bed, that I get fed up enough to wake myself completely, grab the ball, and throw it out the door.
But I digress…
The point of this observation was to explain how this new cat has a “home base” established underneath my bed. This is his safe place. A place where he can retreat, when things get tough.
The term “home base” was used during the boot camp in D.C. a few weeks ago. Establish a default group in a bar or club, where you can go when you’re not approaching other groups. A place to recharge.
I’ve been retreating to home bases all my life, when things got tough.
My home bases were geographic. I would return to places of my past to gain perspective on my current problems, or simply to cheer myself up.
I would visit the church I grew up in. Or the street corner, where I did a lot of skateboarding in junior high. Or my college campus. Or Burke Lake (a frequent home base for me).
I return to these locations to gain perspective on the current circumstances of my life. I also go there to simply feel good.
Again, this touches on my idea of associating the feeling of happiness with external sources—in this case locations.
Visiting these places—returning to home bases—provides a happiness fix. But like all artificial sources of happiness, their effect wears off over time.
Now, when I think of places I could go to feel that sense of recharge, I draw a blank. I think the very notion of going somewhere to gain perspective has been put in perspective, and I’ve seen its futility.
It’s another artificial sweetener of life.
Happiness, safety… They’re internal emotions that we’ve associated with external behaviors and places.
————————-
Just this week, I almost bought a condo in Cherrydale (a part of Arlington). I was willing to overlook several of the flaws of such a plan simply because I felt the “home base” phenomenon. I felt like I was returning to my hometown. It felt safe. Therefore I thought I should do it.
I haven’t yet concluded that having home bases is a bad thing, but I’m definitely sure that it CAN be a bad thing.
Relying solely on emotion, when making financial decisions, can be devastating.
When I took one last look at the condo today, I felt like my eyes were suddenly open to everything the decision entailed. My choice was made even easier, when the seller broke her word and requested a slight bit more than she had previously. I told her that, on principle, I don’t do business with people who do not have integrity. (Let your “yes” be “yes” and your “no” be “no.”) End of deal.
I am now looking at places that make the most logistical and economic sense. I’m removing the emotion from the equation.
————————-
When I came home, I had a new Netflix movie. It was Madonna’s Immaculate [Video] Collection. When the videos for “Papa Don’t Preach” and “La Isla Bonita” came on, I was consumed with the “home base” feeling. I’ve associated those songs/videos with the happiest period of my life. Early to mid 80’s. Elementary school years.
The only songs that provide a more intense feeling of happiness for me are the old hymns sung in the church where I grew up in. Located in Cherrydale.
————————-
I don’t think it’s wrong to associate happiness or safety with external sources. But I do think it’s important to be aware that you’re doing it. And not to rely solely on external sources to provide these feelings.
The reputation emotions have is that they are somehow more genuine than rational thought. Do what feels good—not what you think is right. If you’re true to your passions, you’re supposedly on the correct path.
The problem with that line of thinking, of course, is that emotions are subjective. What makes one person happy is not what makes other people happy. All of a sudden, everything is permissible (because if something makes one person happy, it can’t be wrong).
But when you understand the relationship between the feeling of happiness and external sources, you’ll understand that relying on emotions is a weak foundation for decision making.
People have associated the action of harming other people, animals, etc. with the feeling of happiness. In this case, they should not pursue happiness.
But some people associate the action of helping people, animals, etc. with the feeling of happiness. In this case, they should pursue what makes them happy.
The difference between these two examples is the specific external action involved. That action is deemed right or wrong by rational thought. No emotion is involved.
————————-
So, I guess my conclusion is don’t do what makes you happy. Do what’s right. And learn to condition your subjective emotions to find happiness in doing what’s right.
This is very simple advice. It has universal application.
P.S. This blog is simply free association writing. I am not concerned with editing it in such a way as to make a clear argument. As you can see, my conclusion appears to have nothing to do with my brother’s cat.
P.S.S. The antithesis of this discussion of happiness is a discussion of fear. In the same way, we associate fear with external things (people, places, past experiences). If you can learn to disassociate yourself from your fear and act rationally in the face of fear, you’ll be quite successful in life.
P.S.S.S. I wish every woman would dress like Madonna in her “Lucky Star” video.